The SOMS Debate, Source Distance, Plant Selections, and a Restoration-Oriented Definition of Native
by Thomas N. Kaye
Tom Kaye is Executive Director of the Institute for Applied Ecology, a non-profit organization in Corvallis, Oregon dedicated to natural resource conservation, research, and education. He has a PhD from Oregon State University, where he is a courtesy Assistant Professor in the Department of Botany and Plant Pathology. After working for Olympic National Park (1984-1987), he joined the Oregon Department of Agriculture’s Plant Conservation Biology Program (1988-2000) where he conducted research and contributed to policy for management of threatened and endangered plant species. He has served on the IUCN Species Survival Commission, Re-introduction Specialist Group and is a member of the Native Plant Society of Oregon. Tom specializes in native and endangered plant propagation and restoration, the population dynamics of rare plants, population viability analysis, noxious weed control, development of habitat management and restoration techniques, and monitoring. In addition, his interests include plant-pollinator interactions and plant systematics.
INTRODUCTION
Native plant propagation, restoration, and conservation are complex activities that require many steps and decisions, and face many challenges. On one hand, there is broad agreement, at least among restorationists, over the importance of native plants and the benefits of habitat restoration. But on the other, there is widespread uncertainty and dissent about how to achieve these restoration goals. What should be planted and where? How should plant-materials for restoration be obtained? Where should they come from? What is the overall goal? The objective of this paper is to identify areas of agreement and disagreement to help frame debates in native plant restoration, and thus improve our ability to discuss and conduct this work from a position of mutual understanding and productive dialogue. Continue reading →